All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Mount version older than kernel: 4 vs. 6
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:04:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040804130419.GI4471@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4110DB81.4020103@bio.ifi.lmu.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 864 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:50:09PM +0200, Frank Steiner wrote:
> Just a stupid question: why does the nfsmount.h from the kernel source
> define NFS_MOUNT_VERSION 6? Shouldn't this number match the latest nfs
> version, i.e., 4? I've never heard of nfs v6 yet :-)
> Or is the meaning of NFS_MOUNT_VERSION different?

That's the version of the NFS kernel mount struct, and is
absolutely unrelated to the NFS version (except that both
grow monotonically over time).

> Would it be safe to patch nfsmount.h and set the number to 4 for my
> own kernel to get rid of this warning, or could that break sth. else?
> It just fills my logs and I want to get rid of it...

Our kernel has a patch to silence that warning for versions < 3.
But I wouldn't mind if it was nixed entirely.

Olaf
-- 
Olaf Kirch     |  The Hardware Gods hate me.
okir@suse.de   |
---------------+ 

[-- Attachment #2: nfs-mount-warning --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]

Bug #36841: Disable ``mount version is older than kernel'' warning:
The kernel for SL 9.1 will support a higher mount version than the
mount binary.

Bug #37689: Some people still saw kernel messages complaining about
the mount version. It seems this happens when the first mount attempt
using kernel mount version 4 fails for some reason (for instance if
the server doesn't support NFSv3) mount falls back to mount version 3.
So we should really warn about versions < 3 only.    --okir

Index: linux-2.6.4/fs/nfs/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.4.orig/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.4/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -1389,8 +1389,9 @@ static struct super_block *nfs_get_sb(st
 		memset(root->data+root->size, 0, sizeof(root->data)-root->size);
 
 	if (data->version != NFS_MOUNT_VERSION) {
-		printk("nfs warning: mount version %s than kernel\n",
-			data->version < NFS_MOUNT_VERSION ? "older" : "newer");
+		if (data->version < 3)
+			printk("nfs warning: mount version %d is older "
+			       "than 3\n", data->version);
 		if (data->version < 2)
 			data->namlen = 0;
 		if (data->version < 3)

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-04 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-04 12:50 Mount version older than kernel: 4 vs. 6 Frank Steiner
2004-08-04 13:04 ` Olaf Kirch [this message]
2004-08-04 13:25   ` Frank Steiner
2004-08-04 13:51     ` Olaf Kirch
2004-08-04 21:34       ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040804130419.GI4471@suse.de \
    --to=okir@suse.de \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.