From: "S Mohan" <smohan@vsnl.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] should I shape tun[N] or eth0 ?
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 03:37:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040805032857.CB99744DB@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408041735.07132.etienne@unix.za.org>
AFAIK, tc will work on real and not virtual interfaces.
Warm regards
Mohan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl
> [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl] On Behalf Of Etienne Ledoux
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:05 PM
> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Subject: [LARTC] should I shape tun[N] or eth0 ?
>
> Greetings,
>
> me again. I'm starting to feel miff now.
>
> If I have a few vpn tunnels with different tun interfaces.
> And all this tunnel traffic is coming in on my eth0
> interface, it also leave via eth0 again. I would like to
> share the available bandwidth evenly with tunnel clients.
> Would applying the bandwidth rule on eth0 with htb & sfq work
> for sharing the bandwidth or will bandwidth rules only affect
> tunnel traffic if I apply it to the actual tun[n] intefaces ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-05 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-04 15:35 [LARTC] should I shape tun[N] or eth0 ? Etienne Ledoux
2004-08-05 3:37 ` S Mohan [this message]
2004-08-05 9:51 ` Rene Gallati
2004-08-05 9:54 ` Rio Martin.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040805032857.CB99744DB@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=smohan@vsnl.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.