From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267923AbUHESlg (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:41:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267877AbUHESgF (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:36:05 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:25837 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267874AbUHES0t (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:26:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 19:26:03 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" Cc: Andrew Morton , axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cciss update [1 of 6] Message-ID: <20040805182603.GD12308@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:23:20AM -0500, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote: > Sorry, I thought the descriptions in the patch were sufficient. > Again, I wish viro would copy me on patches to cciss. Isn't that the normal protocol, include the maintainer in any updates? My apologies; it *was* a part of huge series, though ;-/