From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@interlinx.bc.ca>, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: oops on resume
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:03:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040805210349.GA23087@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040805202941.GB28775@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:29:41PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:19:30PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>
> > Yeah, me too. Any (one have any) idea how to calculate fsb for that
> > sucker?
>
> Hunting for docs on developer.intel.com right now. So far I've turned
> up nothing useful. Can you edit pentium4_get_frequency() in arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c
> so that before the switch (fsb_code) { add a
> printk ("FSB code = %d\n", fsb_code);
_and_ enable SPEEDSTEP_DEBUG in both speedstep-ich.c and speedstep-lib.c
> Hopefully, Intel are predictable and this is going to be '4'.
>
> > I may as well throw that code in there too to see if it
> > alleviates the problem.
>
> reminds me, moving speedstep's dprintk over to the same style
> as longhaul/powernow-k7 should happen sometime, then it's just a
> module parameter away instead of a recompile.
... though I'd prefer if it'd be done at the cpufreq-core level, i.e.
cpufreq_dprintk(); with a sysfs-exported ( /sys/parameters/cpufreq/debug )
boot-time parameter cpufreq.debug=1
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-05 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-05 19:02 oops on resume Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 19:26 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-05 19:34 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 19:52 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 20:02 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 20:08 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 20:19 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 20:29 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 21:03 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2004-08-05 21:26 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 21:27 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 21:29 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 21:09 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-05 21:45 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 17:14 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-06 17:43 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 17:55 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-06 21:13 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-06 21:18 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 21:44 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-06 22:10 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 22:51 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-06 23:00 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 23:23 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-07 13:24 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-07 19:03 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-08 16:24 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-09 13:37 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-09 14:53 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-09 17:27 ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-09 19:38 ` Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040805210349.GA23087@dominikbrodowski.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
--cc=brian@interlinx.bc.ca \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.