From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: oops on resume Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 22:27:42 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040805212742.GC28775@redhat.com> References: <20040805192613.GA9008@dominikbrodowski.de> <1091734482.10552.20.camel@pc> <20040805195248.GA32045@redhat.com> <1091736171.10552.26.camel@pc> <20040805200857.GA28775@redhat.com> <1091737170.10552.32.camel@pc> <20040805202941.GB28775@redhat.com> <1091741165.10552.38.camel@pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091741165.10552.38.camel@pc> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Brian J. Murrell" Cc: Dominik Brodowski , cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 05:26:05PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 21:29 +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > > Can you edit pentium4_get_frequency() in arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c > > so that before the switch (fsb_code) { add a > > printk ("FSB code = %d\n", fsb_code); > > > > Hopefully, Intel are predictable and this is going to be '4'. > > You are not going to believe this. It's 0: Ok, that matches Dominik's theory that it's a quad-pumped 100MHz bus. Dave