From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266289AbUHGGcU (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 02:32:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267776AbUHGGcU (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 02:32:20 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:46767 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266289AbUHGGcS (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 02:32:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:30:01 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Hubertus Franke Cc: mbligh@aracnet.com, efocht@hpce.nec.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org, steiner@sgi.com, jbarnes@sgi.com, sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net, djh@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, colpatch@us.ibm.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de, sivanich@sgi.com Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement Message-Id: <20040806233001.4218ca0c.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <4113A860.4070007@watson.ibm.com> References: <20040805100901.3740.99823.84118@sam.engr.sgi.com> <20040805190500.3c8fb361.pj@sgi.com> <247790000.1091762644@[10.10.2.4]> <200408061730.06175.efocht@hpce.nec.com> <267050000.1091806507@[10.10.2.4]> <4113A860.4070007@watson.ibm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hubertus wrote: > As indicated above, this would mean to create a resource controller > and assign mask to them, which is not what we have done so far, as > our current controllers are more share focused. Could you explain this a bit? In particular, the phrases "assign mask" and "share focused" went wizzing right on past me. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373