From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263001AbUHJIyL (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:54:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263204AbUHJIw4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:52:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:7055 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263001AbUHJIwA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:52:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:30:18 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: William Lee Irwin III , Jesse Barnes , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin Subject: Re: 2.6.8-rc3-mm2 Message-ID: <20040810083018.GA27270@elte.hu> References: <20040808152936.1ce2eab8.akpm@osdl.org> <20040809112550.2ea19dbf.akpm@osdl.org> <200408091132.39752.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <200408091217.50786.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20040809195323.GU11200@holomorphy.com> <20040809204357.GX11200@holomorphy.com> <20040809211042.GY11200@holomorphy.com> <20040809224546.GZ11200@holomorphy.com> <20040810063445.GE11200@holomorphy.com> <20040810080206.GF11200@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040810080206.GF11200@holomorphy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Okay, it's down to one printk() and other smaller changes now. The > mb() and __init removal are both unnecessary too. so the same patch but without the printk change still crashes? how about applying only the printk change? (delay effect?) Ingo