From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Payal Rathod Subject: Re: firewall problem continued Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:46:45 -0400 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040810114645.GA27182@tranquility.scriptkitchen.com> References: <20040809081216.GA12643@tranquility.scriptkitchen.com> <200408100926.33589.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> <20040810084353.GB22730@tranquility.scriptkitchen.com> <200408101014.22969.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408101014.22969.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Netfilter ML On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:14:22AM +0100, Antony Stone wrote: > > No idea. I thought that is recommended. I mean every machine should > > be able to access itself using all its IPs. > > That would mean "all IPs on all interfaces of the machine". It doesn't > include arbitrary IPs which some other machine may choose to translate to an > IP on this machine's interface. Let me rephrase it. A mail server needs to connect to any IP in the world so why cannot it connect to an IP which is in its subnet. Thanks a lot for the info. With warm regards, -Payal