From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267877AbUHKCXu (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:23:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267878AbUHKCXt (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:23:49 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:4480 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267877AbUHKCXs (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:23:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:23:45 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: spaminos-ker@yahoo.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others) Message-ID: <20040811022345.GN11200@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , spaminos-ker@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040811010116.GL11200@holomorphy.com> <20040811022143.4892.qmail@web13910.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040811022143.4892.qmail@web13910.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:21:43PM -0700, spaminos-ker@yahoo.com wrote: > I am not very familiar with all the parameters, so I just kept the defaults > Anything else I could try? > Nicolas No. It appeared that the SPA bits had sufficient fairness in them to pass this test but apparently not quite enough. -- wli