From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268449AbUHLHZC (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 03:25:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268448AbUHLHZC (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 03:25:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:58047 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268447AbUHLHW0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 03:22:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:21:27 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Lee Revell Cc: Florian Schmidt , linux-kernel , Felipe Alfaro Solana , jackit-devel , Paul Davis Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc3-O5 Message-ID: <20040812072127.GA20386@elte.hu> References: <20040809104649.GA13299@elte.hu> <20040810132654.GA28915@elte.hu> <1092174959.5061.6.camel@mindpipe> <20040811073149.GA4312@elte.hu> <20040811074256.GA5298@elte.hu> <1092210765.1650.3.camel@mindpipe> <20040811090639.GA8354@elte.hu> <20040811141649.447f112f@mango.fruits.de> <20040811124342.GA17017@elte.hu> <1092268536.1090.7.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1092268536.1090.7.camel@mindpipe> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Lee Revell wrote: > There is definitely some subtle bug in the preempt-timing patch, > because I am getting reports of long non-preemptible sections, which > do not correspond to an xrun in jackd - if these were real then even a > 400usec non-preemptible section would cause an xrun. I do not seem to > get many xruns during normal jackd operation. could you send me these latest preempt-timing warnings? Ingo