From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Zick" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Should I read SHR[DW] as SHRP[DW] in parisc2.pdf? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:33:15 -0500 Message-ID: <200408121433.15444.mszick@goquest.com> References: <200408121741.KAA29481@lucy.cup.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <200408121741.KAA29481@lucy.cup.hp.com> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Thu August 12 2004 12:41, Jim Hull wrote: > Joel: > - - - - - > > Does the PA2.0 gnu assembler not recognize these (and other) pseudo-ops? Perhaps too well. If I recall properly, the same table & code is used for both the assembler and the 'disassemble' (-d) option of objdump. 'objdump -d' tries to be explicit in showing the space register assumed... but it also displays the pseudo operations rather than the actual operation. (Grumble, Grumble) I think that Joel's question comes from (his and my) wondering if we need to make 'machine independent' defines of some of these instructions. According to Appendix J - we don't - the PA1.1 codes will assemble for PA2.0 (with HP's assembler). Time will show if gcc-inline assembly is that nice to we programmers. Mike _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux