From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269054AbUHMKWd (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:22:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269062AbUHMKWc (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:22:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:65461 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269054AbUHMKT3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:19:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:21:09 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Roland Dreier Cc: Lee Revell , linux-kernel , Felipe Alfaro Solana , Florian Schmidt Subject: Re: [patch] Latency Tracer, voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc4-O6 Message-ID: <20040813102109.GF8135@elte.hu> References: <20040810132654.GA28915@elte.hu> <20040812235116.GA27838@elte.hu> <1092360317.1304.72.camel@mindpipe> <1092360704.1304.76.camel@mindpipe> <1092364786.877.1.camel@mindpipe> <1092369242.2769.1.camel@mindpipe> <1092370997.2769.5.camel@mindpipe> <527js31wpv.fsf@topspin.com> <1092372092.3450.0.camel@mindpipe> <523c2r1w7v.fsf@topspin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <523c2r1w7v.fsf@topspin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Roland Dreier wrote: > Look at Ingo's patch; it only adds mcount() to arch/i386 (although > __mcount is defined in kernel/latency.c, there's no way for any other > arch to call it). should be trivial to add it to other arches. But the patch indeed is x86-only for the time being - 100% of the testers so far were x86 users so i dont see any point in bloating the patch with untested arch changes. Tested contributions are welcome of course! Ingo