From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Zick" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] uninline in bitops.c as ia64 or sparc64? Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:15:49 -0500 Message-ID: <200408131315.49038.mszick@goquest.com> References: <40FB89640000B461@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <200408120859.28306.mszick@goquest.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <200408120859.28306.mszick@goquest.com> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Thu August 12 2004 08:59, Michael S. Zick wrote: > On Wed August 11 2004 06:58, Joel Soete wrote: > > > > Please note that I have to abuse the original ffs() code with ULffs() and > > an unsigned long (64bit long for hppa64-gcc) as parameter (the original > > was an integer of 32bit long for 64bit and 32bit gcc). > > > > hth, > > Joel > Thanks for the testing and the help Joel. > So I would like the m-l to consider that patch sent > earlier be upgraded from "suggested" to "submitted". > Just a PS... include/asm-parisc/bitops.h:: int fls(int x) Is only scanning the sign (or zero) extension of an integer on 64-bit machines. Any objections if I submit a fix for that one also? Mike _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux