From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KOVACS Krisztian Subject: Re: [nf-failover] [RFC] ct_sync 0.15 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:35:58 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040813173558.GA415@sch.bme.hu> References: <1092404121.2402.67.camel@nienna.balabit> <411CC99C.7020205@surestorm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Netfilter-failover list , netfilter-devel Return-path: To: Jonathan G - Mailing Lists Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <411CC99C.7020205@surestorm.com> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 04:01:00PM +0200, Jonathan G - Mailing Lists wrote: > my partner and me are preparing for the next week a firewall/High > Availability/Load Balancer cluster made of the following software: > > - Security: IPTables 1.2.8 > - HA: KeepAlived (only the VRRPv2 part) > - LB: Pen (siag.nu/pen) for tcp connections > > > We would be so pleased and interested in test you package and discuss a > real wold implementation (the installation of this cluster (2 nodes) is > for an ISP). Wow, great. Primarily I would like if you could do some testing. I don't think ct_sync is production-ready, but definitely needs testing in as many different environments as possible. So, if you have some extra time and could give ct_sync a test run, I'd be really happy. > Drop me an email to tell how start and we will help all of us get more > real results with our system. Hmmm, in theory all you have to do is check out the netfilter-ha repository from CVS, and all instructions should be given in the README file there. (Probably the most problematic part is getting the patches applied to your kernel. If you have problems doing so, I'll happily help with creating an aggregated patch.) To check out the tree, use: $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs:cvs@pserver.netfilter.org:/cvspublic co netfilter-ha -- KOVACS Krisztian