From: Sander Smeenk <ssmeenk+netfilter@freshdot.net>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: ip_conntrack_in: Frag of proto 17
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:24:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040814142407.GD7528@freshdot.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089646231.3157.23.camel@scratch.dynamic.vt.edu>
Quoting Tim Rhodes (rhodes@vt.edu):
> Is there any additional information/understanding of this condition.
It has to do with the size of UDP packets, as I understood. The packets
can not exceed 8K in size or ip_conntrack_in starts messing up.
You can test this by mounting an nfs share locally, and play with
rsize/wsize parameters.
> Is there and if so, what's the limit.
There is. 8K. Exceed that and it will fail.
What I don't understand is WHY this limit suddenly appeared, and why
there's so little discussion about it. I think this is a really big
problem, since not all tools that do UDP can (easily) be told to use
blocks of <= 8192 bytes. For example, my sfs shares are now completely
useless, which bites me ever since I switched to kernels >2.6.5.
Yet, nobody knows why this change was made, or what can be done to work
around it. I *HAD* a working solution: no udp tracking:
ipv4 -t raw -A PREROUTING -p udp -j NOTRACK
ipv4 -A FORWARD -m state --state UNTRACKED -j ACCEPT
but that stopped working with kernels >2.6.7.
So, can anyone from the netfilter-dev team shed some light?
Thanks,
Sander.
--
| There's nothing like waking up with your Dickin's Cider!
| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-14 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-12 15:30 ip_conntrack_in: Frag of proto 17 Tim Rhodes
2004-08-14 14:24 ` Sander Smeenk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040814142407.GD7528@freshdot.net \
--to=ssmeenk+netfilter@freshdot.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.