From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Glamm Subject: Re: RAID migration from 2.4 -> 2.6 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:23:08 -0500 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040817032308.GA31824@romulus.a-s-i.com> References: <20040812152939.GD5326@romulus.a-s-i.com> <20040816223541.GA1197@romulus.a-s-i.com> <41213B52.60903@tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41213B52.60903@tls.msk.ru> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids > >I'm not sure why the devices can't be found: the Adaptec driver appears > >to go through its initialization routines just fine and find all the > >disks. > > How about sd_mod (scsi disk module)? Is it loaded (or compiled into the > kernel) together with the adaptec driver? Does the kernel prints a line > like > sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 sda6 sda7 sda8 sda9 > > (partition layout) for all your disks? I cannot (at the moment) say anything about the partition line being printed out, but: * legacy /proc/scsi/ support * SCSI disk support * SCSI tape support * SCSI CDROM support * SCSI generic support * Verbose SCSI error reporting * SCSI logging facility SCSI Transport Attributes --> * SPI SCSI low-level drivers --> AIC7xxx Fast -> U160 support (new driver) --> Adaptec AIC79xx U320 support are all compiled into the kernel. I wonder if it's possible there's a collision between the AIC79xx and AIC7xxx driver. I suppose I could try eliminating the AIC79xx driver (as I have a pair of 7899's and a 7892 in these systems, no 79xx..) -Bob