From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Lee Irwin III Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:12:25 +0000 Subject: Re: Sun4d progress Message-Id: <20040819141225.GN11200@holomorphy.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:57:47PM +0100, C.Newport wrote: >> Something odd is going on - Thomas claimed that 2.4.23-pre5 booted but >> was unstable, which I cannot achieve. Maybe our environments are >> different, but I have built this 4 times with 2.4.22 and 2.4.27 on both >> old and new compilers and the result is consistent. Maybe Thomas had >> applied some other patch before these ?. On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:47:17PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > hmm, thinking about it, there is one hunk I usually throw out of that > patch: [...] > Without that gcc 3.0.4 generates instructions, which btfixup couldn't > resolve. I suspect there are some compiler troubles left, because the > images I've build with gcc 3.3.3 aren't even working on my SS20 last > time I tried ... Okay, what gcc/binutils is everyone using and can we start slinging binaries compiled from the same kernel compiled by different gcc's around so I can diagnose this? Thanks. -- wli