From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267445AbUHSWAw (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:00:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267446AbUHSWAw (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:00:52 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:23524 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267445AbUHSWAv (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:00:51 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: Ray Bryant Subject: Re: kernbench on 512p Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:00:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , hawkes@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com References: <200408191216.33667.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <200408191711.04776.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <4125208D.5070809@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <4125208D.5070809@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408191800.41995.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, August 19, 2004 5:50 pm, Ray Bryant wrote: > Anyway, the read lock handling is sufficiently busticated that we should > probably just remove it. I have a patch someplace (years old) to fix this, > but it never seemed to be important to anyone, so it is still unapplied. It would be nice if you resurrected it and sent it along to Andrew. He's had the lockmeter patch in his tree for awhile now, so having a good version there is probably a good idea. Thanks, Jesse