From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sun4d SMP - retests - patch was not required
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 22:28:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040819222854.GC11200@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408192322.43126.crn@netunix.com>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:22:43PM +0100, C.Newport wrote:
> I have done some more tests and found a surprise.
> booting with -p causes the lockup at
> ioremap: done with statics switching to malloc.
> This happens reliably, every time. Is this a clue ?.
> Booting without -p boots reliably, which led me to suspect
> that my earlier tests may have been misleading.
> Sure enough - reverting to the SMP kernel without the Pasi
> spin_lock_bh patch does the same so it seems we probably
> do not need this.
*VERY* interesting. Now that we know it's -p ruining it, we need to
know why it's -p doing it. Perhaps the PROM doesn't expect something
we're doing to the cpu.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:22:43PM +0100, C.Newport wrote:
> More test results :-
> Run top from serial console - OK
> telnet in and tar -tf a kernel tarball - this sometimes completes
> but always screws the keyboard input of the serial console.
> If it does not complete it hangs, Load average goes to 1.0.
> Another telnet - can kill the top session but serial kbd input is
> still broken - kill the serial console root shell and all is well again.
> Cannot kill the hung tar process.
> Could this mean that interrupts might be getting
> misrouted to the wrong CPU or process ?.
Yes, though we're really going to have to do more intense diagnostics
(targeted printk'ing out of various bits of state etc.) to discover
what's really happening with interrupts. Checking detailed dumps of
interrupt routing state etc. vs. 2.2.x sound like a good first shot.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-19 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-19 22:22 Sun4d SMP - retests - patch was not required C.Newport
2004-08-19 22:28 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-08-19 23:04 ` C.Newport
2004-08-19 23:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-19 23:46 ` C.Newport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040819222854.GC11200@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.