From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herve Eychenne Subject: Re: #263154: iptables: segfault with multiple ip hostnames Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:09:59 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040820160959.GF4883@eychenne.org> References: <20040803220350.GA5223@ljlane.net> <4110110E.40904@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Laurence J. Lane" , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4110110E.40904@trash.net> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:26:22AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Laurence J. Lane wrote: > >http://bugs.debian.org/263154 > > > >iptables 1.2.11 segfaults when given a domain name that resolves=20 > >to multiple ip addresses. The situation is the same for kernel=20 > >versions 2.4.26 and 2.6.7. > > > >As an example: > > > > # iptables -I INPUT -s google.com -j DROP > > free(): invalid pointer 0x8055a4c! > > Segmentation fault > >=20 > > > Already fixed in CVS: > http://cvs.netfilter.org/iptables/iptables.c?r1=3D1.68&r2=3D1.69 Does this change make sense for ip6tables as well? If so, were the equivalent changes committed as well? Herve --=20 _ (=B0=3D Herv=E9 Eychenne //) v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/