From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268113AbUHTXXe (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:23:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268793AbUHTXXe (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:23:34 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:4588 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268113AbUHTXXd (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:23:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 09:20:50 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Rik van Riel Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com Subject: Re: 2.6.8.1-mm2 - reiser4 Message-ID: <20040820232050.GI1945@krispykreme> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Oh, and another one. The reiser 4 system call > sys_reiserfs seems to need an additional patch, > which is craftily hidden inside reiser4-only.patch > > That patch creates fs/reiser4/linux-5_reiser4_syscall.patch, > which I can only assume reiser 4 users should apply... I would assume a compat layer interface would be a requirement to merging such a syscall interface. Does it exist? Anton