All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Miklas <public@mikl.as>
To: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux Incompatibility List
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:53:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408211955.44914.public@mikl.as> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040821205157.GA9300@animx.eu.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On August 21, 2004 04:51 pm, Wakko Warner wrote:
<snip>
> Does any broadcom
> wireless chip work on linux (ndis wrapper or that piece of junk from
> linuxant doesn't count)

Yeah, their wireless chips work fine on Linux if you are running just about 
any wireless access point / router that makes use of Broadcom's hardware.  

That probably seems like a pointless nitpick, but I think that makes their 
non-support of Linux on general-purpose hardware even worse.  They've already 
written wireless drivers for Linux, but simply refuse to work with anyone to 
get their hardware running under Linux for other architectures.  They even 
refuse to simply recompile their driver for i386 and release it binary-only.  
For that matter, they won't even respond to e-mail on the subject.  (The most 
I've ever got from them was a few engineers responding 'off the record'.)

Even more annoying is the way their Linux/MIPSel binaries are tied to a 
particular kernel version.  (They've got the inlines from skbuff.h scattered 
all over their module --- at least they did in the driver included with the 
Linksys WAP54G v. 1.08 which was the one I carefully looked at.)  This 
creates a serious problem for anyone who wants to get their wireless 
routers / access points to run a different version of the kernel.

They seem to be very selective about when they acknowledge Linux's existence.  
IMHO, this makes them even worse than a company that has decided to simply 
ignore Linux all together.



- -- Andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Key ID: EC3F6CCD (www.keyserver.net)

iD8DBQFBJ+CNTHKGaOw/bM0RAoGJAJoCJOZTuNayN2jCmzCfSbXAbUhkmgCfdk5G
vLETYsG6DBPFZ5jBeq4MGbM=
=r+T+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-21 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-21 19:41 Linux Incompatibility List David N. Welton
2004-08-21 20:16 ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-08-21 20:20   ` Wakko Warner
2004-08-21 20:31     ` Lee Revell
2004-08-21 20:51       ` Wakko Warner
2004-08-21 21:06         ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-08-21 21:11           ` Lee Revell
2004-08-21 21:16           ` Lee Revell
2004-08-22 14:30           ` Tonnerre
2004-08-22 14:45             ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-24 15:17             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-08-24 17:41               ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-21 21:18         ` Francois Romieu
2004-08-21 22:01           ` Wakko Warner
2004-08-21 23:53         ` Andrew Miklas [this message]
2004-08-23  3:54           ` Gianni Tedesco
2004-08-25  5:59             ` Andrew Miklas
2004-08-25  7:21               ` Gianni Tedesco
2004-08-29  1:42                 ` Andrew Miklas
2004-08-29  3:21                   ` Gianni Tedesco
2004-08-29 21:04                     ` Andrew Miklas
2004-08-22  5:29       ` Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault
2004-08-22  1:56         ` James Courtier-Dutton
2004-08-22  6:36           ` Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault
2004-08-22  4:15             ` Kyle Moffett
2004-08-22  5:58               ` Lee Revell
2004-08-22  8:05               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-22 12:07                 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-08-22 12:32                   ` Gene Heskett
2004-08-24 21:30               ` Hamie
2004-08-22 15:25         ` Tonnerre
2004-08-22 11:10       ` Alan Cox
2004-08-22 12:42         ` Dave Jones
2004-08-23  6:31           ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-08-21 21:20     ` David N. Welton
2004-08-21 22:03       ` Wakko Warner
2004-08-22  0:18         ` Rutger Nijlunsing
2004-08-21 20:22   ` David N. Welton
2004-08-22 11:14 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-22 15:08   ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-08-22 20:48   ` David N. Welton
2004-08-22 20:45     ` Alan Cox
2004-08-23 20:45       ` cliff white
     [not found] ` <200408221045.29316.mbuesch@freenet.de>
2004-08-22 20:34   ` David N. Welton
2004-08-22 21:24     ` David N. Welton
2004-08-25  7:41 ` Helge Hafting
2004-08-25  7:49   ` David N. Welton
2004-08-31  7:28     ` Helge Hafting
2004-08-31 10:21       ` David N. Welton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-22  4:19 linux
2004-08-22 13:05 ` Wakko Warner
2004-08-22 16:43   ` Horst von Brand
2004-08-22 22:42     ` Robin Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200408211955.44914.public@mikl.as \
    --to=public@mikl.as \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=wakko@animx.eu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.