From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266240AbUHWR4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:56:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266249AbUHWR4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:56:07 -0400 Received: from imladris.demon.co.uk ([193.237.130.41]:32520 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266240AbUHWR4A (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:56:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:55:54 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Markus Lidel Cc: Christoph Hellwig , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, wtogami@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Merge I2O patches from -mm Message-ID: <20040823185554.B19476@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Markus Lidel , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, wtogami@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4123E171.3070104@shadowconnect.com> <20040819002448.A3905@infradead.org> <4123E73F.7040409@shadowconnect.com> <20040819104829.A7705@infradead.org> <41247E0E.8030005@shadowconnect.com> <20040819110635.A7850@infradead.org> <4124950B.1090706@shadowconnect.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <4124950B.1090706@shadowconnect.com>; from Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com on Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 01:54:51PM +0200 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by phoenix.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 01:54:51PM +0200, Markus Lidel wrote: > I still liked the multiplexer approach more, because there where much > less copy-and-paste code :-) > > But is it okay for you now? Yes, looks better. mid-term we should look into some helper macros to reduce the clutter and get locking right, but for now that patch should do it.