From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <lkml@felipe-alfaro.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm1
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:45:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408261646.08419.lkml@felipe-alfaro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408261636.06857.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]
On Thursday 26 August 2004 16:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I think the problem is that relatively not so many people run -mm, and even
> less people try to use them for a longer time. Also, there sometimes are
> some issues with -mm that must be sorted out first, but then there's not
> much time left for testing the scheduler before the next -mm.
I think this is the main reason of existence for -mm kernels: find problems,
sort them out and fix them. I've been running -mm kernels since 2.5.80+ and
all problems I have had were resolved in a timely manner.
What I think is that Con's scheduler is the one that needs to get into -mm
kernels to give it more exposure. Currently, it has a very limited audience.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-26 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-26 8:47 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Andrew Morton
2004-08-26 11:07 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Con Kolivas
2004-08-26 14:28 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Jurriaan
2004-08-26 18:25 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Thomas Davis
2004-08-26 14:36 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-08-26 14:45 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana [this message]
2004-08-26 15:35 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-08-26 16:38 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Con Kolivas
2004-08-26 20:36 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-08-26 20:55 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-26 23:19 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Con Kolivas
2004-08-26 23:43 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-27 0:37 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Nuno Silva
2004-08-27 0:46 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Con Kolivas
2004-08-27 0:51 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-27 0:55 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Con Kolivas
2004-08-27 0:58 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rick Lindsley
2004-08-27 20:54 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-08-27 21:54 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rick Lindsley
2004-08-27 22:29 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-09-03 21:11 ` schedstat-2.6.8.1 [was: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm1] Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-09-08 7:09 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-09-04 18:35 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-09-08 8:10 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rick Lindsley
2004-09-04 23:10 ` latency.c [was: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm1] Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-09-08 8:12 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-09-08 12:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-08-26 20:51 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-27 1:43 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Nick Piggin
2004-08-26 12:06 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Denis Vlasenko
2004-08-26 19:40 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Sam Ravnborg
2004-08-26 17:58 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-08-26 18:53 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 - undefined references - [PATCH] Paolo Ornati
2004-08-28 8:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-28 9:45 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-08-26 22:46 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-08-26 22:50 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Andrew Morton
2004-08-26 23:53 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Tomasz Torcz
[not found] ` <20040827043132.GJ2793@holomorphy.com>
2004-08-27 21:42 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 5:26 ` [0/4] standardized waitqueue hashing William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 5:31 ` [1/4] standardize bit waiting data type William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 5:35 ` [2/4] consolidate bit waiting code patterns William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 5:37 ` [3/4] eliminate bh waitqueue hashtable William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 5:38 ` [4/4] eliminate inode " William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 6:17 ` [1/4] standardize bit waiting data type Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 6:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 6:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 6:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 9:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 9:22 ` [2/4] consolidate bit waiting code patterns William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 9:23 ` [3/4] eliminate bh waitqueue hashtable William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 9:24 ` [4/4] eliminate inode " William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 9:43 ` [3/4] eliminate bh " Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 9:34 ` [2/4] consolidate bit waiting code patterns Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 9:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 9:39 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 9:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 9:18 ` [1/4] standardize bit waiting data type Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-28 9:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 9:06 ` [patch] 2.6.9-rc1-mm1: megaraid_mbox.c compile error with gcc 3.4 Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-28 14:14 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Sid Boyce
2004-08-28 15:22 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408261646.08419.lkml@felipe-alfaro.com \
--to=lkml@felipe-alfaro.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.