From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269311AbUH0DDc (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:03:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269380AbUHZSxY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:53:24 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:22500 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269344AbUHZSqV (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:46:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:43:05 -0500 From: John Hesterberg To: Tim Schmielau Cc: Andrew Morton , Jay Lan , lkml , erikj@dbear.engr.sgi.com, limin@engr.sgi.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, Ragnar Kj?rstad , Yoshitaka ISHIKAWA , Arthur Corliss , Guillaume Thouvenin Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] new CSA patchset for 2.6.8 Message-ID: <20040826184305.GB11393@sgi.com> References: <412D2E10.8010406@engr.sgi.com> <20040825221842.72dd83a4.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Tim Schmielau wrote: > ... > IMHO CSA, ELSA and BSD accounting are too similar to have more than one of > them in the kernel. We should either improve BSD accounting to do the job, > or kill it in favor of a different implementation. > > Tim We should at least have common data collection in the kernel. I could more easily understand different accounting packages on top of that that might meet different needs of different classes of users. John