From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269751AbUHZWig (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:38:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266198AbUHZWdX (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:33:23 -0400 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:62475 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269743AbUHZW3j (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:29:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:26:22 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: "O.Sezer" Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.28-pre2 Message-ID: <20040826222622.GD564@alpha.home.local> References: <412E012F.4050503@ttnet.net.tr> <20040826191501.GA12772@fs.tum.de> <412E3EEB.5010603@ttnet.net.tr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <412E3EEB.5010603@ttnet.net.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:50:03PM +0300, O.Sezer wrote: > >They are not a real problem with gcc 3.4, and whether gcc 3.5 will ever > >be supported as compiler for kernel 2.4 is a question whose answer lies > >far in the future. > > That is a valid point but it'd be sad if gcc3.5 wouldn't be supported. Tell that to gcc developpers who constantly break compatibility between versions. I even have userland programs which do not compile anymore with gcc-3.3 and which I don't even know how to 'fix' (workaround ?). Cheers, Willy