From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Paszkowski Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:40:49 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Large number of HTB classes Message-Id: <20040827114049.GA22016@krezus.e-wro.net> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" List-Id: References: <412EF503.4010908@parknet.dk> In-Reply-To: <412EF503.4010908@parknet.dk> To: lartc@vger.kernel.org --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:22:13PM +0200, Simon Lodal wrote: >=20 > HFSC seems interesting, but does it really work well? I am not afraid of= =20 > new stuff, but bleeding edge is probably too risky. I'am running HFSC for network with 4,5k users, handling about 100Mb/s inter= net traffic with 25kpacket/s without any problems. >=20 > That HTB problem, I guess you mean it is possible to have available=20 > bandwidth, but when some of it has been distributed between users, all=20 > users' ceils go below their quantums? no >=20 > But that implies that users have low ceils? Wouldn't it be solved by=20 > setting all users' ceil to the full link bandwidth? ceil is set to the full link bandwidth. I dosen't help. >=20 > The doubly linked list patch you mention, I believe it should be in=20 > vanilla kernel since 2.4.20-22 or something? I use 2.4.27 here. If not,= =20 > do you have a link for it? http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-08/msg00348.html Consider also using rbtree HFSC patches. --=20 Tomasz Paszkowski --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBLx3BcNXOL98XeysRAk9gAJ9uBZ/gWnp1U1MV9pE8SRCfdIrq5ACfT1NS rPhzKBsP+3AMIbiDeMIDK4s= =RzNy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/