From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S267465AbUH0UkU@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S267465AbUH0UkU (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:40:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266756AbUH0Uj4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:39:56 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:30927 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267465AbUH0U1R (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:27:17 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:24:44 -0700
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Kenneth Lavrsen <kenneth@lavrsen.dk>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, albert@users.sourceforge.net,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pmarques@grupopie.com, greg@kroah.com,
       nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: pwc+pwcx is not illegal
Message-Id: <20040827132444.4b2531df.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040827215143.01d7b038@inet.uni2.dk>
References: <1093634283.431.6370.camel@cube>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0408271226400.14196@ppc970.osdl.org>
	<6.1.2.0.2.20040827215143.01d7b038@inet.uni2.dk>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:06:29 +0200
Kenneth Lavrsen <kenneth@lavrsen.dk> wrote:

> Just look at the reaction everywhere. I have rarely seen so many angry 
> Linux users.

I love sensationalism.  And you're really good at twisting the
facts my friend.  People can still get their cameras working
just fine, but it's convenient for your argument that you ignore
that fact.