From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265331AbUH0OSl (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:18:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265354AbUH0OSl (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:18:41 -0400 Received: from forte.mfa.kfki.hu ([148.6.72.11]:14027 "EHLO forte.mfa.kfki.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265331AbUH0OSd (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:18:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:18:28 +0200 From: Gergely Tamas To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Denis Vlasenko , Andrew Morton , Ram Pai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: data loss in 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Message-ID: <20040827141828.GA19272@mfa.kfki.hu> References: <200408271455.03733.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hmm, 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 looks like not a release to trust your (page > size multiple) data to! You should find the patch below fixes it > (and, I hope, the issue the erroneous patches were trying to fix). > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins $ dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=$((1024*1024)) count=10 10+0 records in 10+0 records out 10485760 bytes transferred in 0.028393 seconds (369307252 bytes/sec) $ du -sb testfile 10485760 testfile $ cat testfile > testfile.1 $ du -sb testfile.1 10485760 testfile.1 Seems to be working fine now, thanks. Gergely