From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267523AbUH1Se3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:34:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267507AbUH1SeY (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:34:24 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:2746 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267605AbUH1Sda (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:33:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:31:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike Subject: Re: [PATCH] move ghash.h were it does less harm Message-Id: <20040828113133.15f335b1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040828105512.GA11067@lst.de> References: <20040828105512.GA11067@lst.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > grmp, UML folks re-added ghash.h despite beeing told repeatedly not to > do so. Oh crap, sorry, I lost track of that. > At least move it to arch/um/ so people don't start to use it > again when they are on similar drugs as thge UML people. We could just delete the file - that'd get Jeff's attention ;)