From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267374AbUH2BTi (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:19:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267480AbUH2BTi (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:19:38 -0400 Received: from web13907.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.175.70]:55568 "HELO web13907.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267374AbUH2BTh (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:19:37 -0400 Message-ID: <20040829011936.39122.qmail@web13907.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Reply-To: spaminos-ker@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others) To: Lee Revell , Peter Williams Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <1093739136.7078.1.camel@krustophenia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- Lee Revell wrote: > Is this an SMP machine? There were problems with that version of the > voluntary preemption patches on SMP. The latest version, Q3, should fix > these. > No, it's a single CPU Athlon 1800+, the kernel is compiled in with support for SMP system, but that should not have any impact. Nicolas