From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S268220AbUH2Rrm@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S268220AbUH2Rrm (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:47:42 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268231AbUH2Rrl
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:47:41 -0400
Received: from adsl-63-197-226-105.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.197.226.105]:41871
	"EHLO cheetah.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S268220AbUH2Rrk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:47:40 -0400
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:46:55 -0700
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Tomasz =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=B3oczko?= <kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, milek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl,
       usenet-20040502@usenet.frodoid.org, miles.lane@comcast.net,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels?
Message-Id: <20040829104655.08ebd928.davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60L.0408291154300.15099@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
References: <200408191822.48297.miles.lane@comcast.net>
	<87hdqyogp4.fsf@killer.ninja.frodoid.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.60L.0408210520380.3003@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
	<1093174557.24319.55.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<Pine.LNX.4.60L.0408232107270.13955@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
	<1093354658.2810.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<Pine.LNX.4.60L.0408290154030.15099@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
	<20040828223018.53ec62e2.davem@davemloft.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.60L.0408291154300.15099@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:45:12 +0200 (CEST)
Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl> wrote:

> Even on two way systems Solaris (10) still *much more*
> *better* handles threads ..

Back this up with facts.