From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:57:08 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040829125708.5aa70469.davem@davemloft.net> References: <412A8FB5.4080700@trash.net> <20040828231529.051a73cc.davem@davemloft.net> <4132303C.2060807@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dlstevens@us.ibm.com, davem@redhat.com, laforge@netfilter.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, okir@suse.de Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <4132303C.2060807@trash.net> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:36:28 +0200 Patrick McHardy wrote: > David S. Miller wrote: > > >I think I agree with David now that I've read through this a few > >times. Can someone send me a patch which does this? > > > > > Attached. The first patch still crashed, we need to prevent new > fragments from getting queued after the queue is flushed until the > hook in unregistered. While we're doing this, is your patch similar to one of the two original ones that Olaf Kirch posted? I want to give him proper attribution, in whatever form is reasonable, that's all. > >Does 2.4.x have this problem too? I thought it didn't. > > > > > I'll have a look, but I think it does. Thanks a lot for helping out with this Patrick.