From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266836AbUH2VAb (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:00:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268305AbUH2VAa (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:00:30 -0400 Received: from hermine.aitel.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:18447 "HELO hermine.aitel.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266836AbUH2VAX (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:00:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:04:36 +0200 To: Albert Cahalan Cc: linux-kernel mailing list , rlrevell@joe-job.com, clemtaylor@comcast.net, qg@biodome.org, rogers@isi.edu Subject: Re: reverse engineering pwcx Message-ID: <20040829210436.GA24350@hh.idb.hist.no> References: <1093709838.434.6797.camel@cube> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1093709838.434.6797.camel@cube> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Helge Hafting Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 12:17:19PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > > The LavaRnd guys examined the pixels on the actual > > CCD chip. It's 160x120. The 'decompression' is > > just interpolation. > > First of all, it's not a CCD chip. It's CMOS. > > Now, here's a Bayer pattern: > > RG > GB > RGRGR > GBGBG > RGRGR > GBGBG > > Don't put much faith in the 160x120 number. There's no need for faith or speculation here. Put the chip under a microscope and count the pixels, or rather measure their size and estimate their number. Helge Hafting