From: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@ee.oulu.fi>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Florian Schirmer <jolt@tuxbox.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:10:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040830061020.GA21270@ee.oulu.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040829234928.GA10060@havoc.gtf.org>
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:49:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > BTW, can someone fixup something for me? Update MODULE_AUTHOR()
> > please :-) 3/4 of this driver have been rewritten since I last
> > touched it, heh.
>
> hehe. I'll take care of it tonight when I queue Florian's stuff
> to netdev-2.6 (and thus -mm, and thus eventually mainline).
And here's a resend of the bounce buffer patch, which should still
apply on top of Florians (or without) just fine.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@ee.oulu.fi>
--- linux-2.6.8-rc3/drivers/net/b44.h.4g4g 2004-08-08 10:54:03.979353080 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc3/drivers/net/b44.h 2004-08-08 10:54:17.928232528 +0300
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@
struct ring_info *rx_buffers;
struct ring_info *tx_buffers;
+ unsigned char *tx_bufs;
u32 dma_offset;
u32 flags;
@@ -525,7 +526,7 @@
struct pci_dev *pdev;
struct net_device *dev;
- dma_addr_t rx_ring_dma, tx_ring_dma;
+ dma_addr_t rx_ring_dma, tx_ring_dma,tx_bufs_dma;
u32 rx_pending;
u32 tx_pending;
--- linux-2.6.8-rc3/drivers/net/b44.c.4g4g 2004-08-08 10:53:58.724151992 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc3/drivers/net/b44.c 2004-08-08 10:54:17.657273720 +0300
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@
#define DRV_MODULE_NAME "b44"
#define PFX DRV_MODULE_NAME ": "
-#define DRV_MODULE_VERSION "0.94"
-#define DRV_MODULE_RELDATE "May 4, 2004"
+#define DRV_MODULE_VERSION "0.95"
+#define DRV_MODULE_RELDATE "Aug 3, 2004"
#define B44_DEF_MSG_ENABLE \
(NETIF_MSG_DRV | \
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
#define B44_DEF_TX_RING_PENDING (B44_TX_RING_SIZE - 1)
#define B44_TX_RING_BYTES (sizeof(struct dma_desc) * \
B44_TX_RING_SIZE)
+#define B44_DMA_MASK 0x3fffffff
#define TX_RING_GAP(BP) \
(B44_TX_RING_SIZE - (BP)->tx_pending)
@@ -67,6 +68,7 @@
#define NEXT_TX(N) (((N) + 1) & (B44_TX_RING_SIZE - 1))
#define RX_PKT_BUF_SZ (1536 + bp->rx_offset + 64)
+#define TX_PKT_BUF_SZ (B44_MAX_MTU + ETH_HLEN + 8)
/* minimum number of free TX descriptors required to wake up TX process */
#define B44_TX_WAKEUP_THRESH (B44_TX_RING_SIZE / 4)
@@ -631,10 +633,30 @@
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- skb->dev = bp->dev;
mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, skb->data,
RX_PKT_BUF_SZ,
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+
+ /* Hardware bug work-around, the chip is unable to do PCI DMA
+ to/from anything above 1GB :-( */
+ if(mapping+RX_PKT_BUF_SZ > B44_DMA_MASK) {
+ /* Sigh... */
+ pci_unmap_single(bp->pdev, mapping, RX_PKT_BUF_SZ,PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+ skb = __dev_alloc_skb(RX_PKT_BUF_SZ,GFP_DMA);
+ if (skb == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, skb->data,
+ RX_PKT_BUF_SZ,
+ PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+ if(mapping+RX_PKT_BUF_SZ > B44_DMA_MASK) {
+ pci_unmap_single(bp->pdev, mapping, RX_PKT_BUF_SZ,PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ }
+
+ skb->dev = bp->dev;
skb_reserve(skb, bp->rx_offset);
rh = (struct rx_header *)
@@ -912,6 +934,12 @@
entry = bp->tx_prod;
mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, skb->data, len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ if(mapping+len > B44_DMA_MASK) {
+ /* Chip can't handle DMA to/from >1GB, use bounce buffer */
+ pci_unmap_single(bp->pdev, mapping, len,PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ memcpy(bp->tx_bufs+entry*TX_PKT_BUF_SZ,skb->data,skb->len);
+ mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, bp->tx_bufs+entry*TX_PKT_BUF_SZ, len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ }
bp->tx_buffers[entry].skb = skb;
pci_unmap_addr_set(&bp->tx_buffers[entry], mapping, mapping);
@@ -1059,6 +1087,11 @@
bp->tx_ring, bp->tx_ring_dma);
bp->tx_ring = NULL;
}
+ if (bp->tx_bufs) {
+ pci_free_consistent(bp->pdev, B44_TX_RING_SIZE * TX_PKT_BUF_SZ,
+ bp->tx_bufs, bp->tx_bufs_dma);
+ bp->tx_bufs = NULL;
+ }
}
/*
@@ -1081,6 +1114,12 @@
goto out_err;
memset(bp->tx_buffers, 0, size);
+ size = B44_TX_RING_SIZE * TX_PKT_BUF_SZ;
+ bp->tx_bufs = pci_alloc_consistent(bp->pdev, size, &bp->tx_bufs_dma);
+ if (!bp->tx_bufs)
+ goto out_err;
+ memset(bp->tx_bufs, 0, size);
+
size = DMA_TABLE_BYTES;
bp->rx_ring = pci_alloc_consistent(bp->pdev, size, &bp->rx_ring_dma);
if (!bp->rx_ring)
@@ -1746,12 +1785,19 @@
pci_set_master(pdev);
- err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) 0xffffffff);
+ err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) B44_DMA_MASK);
if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR PFX "No usable DMA configuration, "
"aborting.\n");
goto err_out_free_res;
}
+
+ err = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) B44_DMA_MASK);
+ if (err) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "No usable DMA configuration, "
+ "aborting.\n");
+ goto err_out_free_res;
+ }
b44reg_base = pci_resource_start(pdev, 0);
b44reg_len = pci_resource_len(pdev, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-29 20:17 [PATCH][0/4] b44: Cleanup and bcm47xx support Florian Schirmer
2004-08-29 20:33 ` [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors Florian Schirmer
2004-08-29 20:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 21:04 ` Florian Schirmer
2004-08-29 23:45 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 23:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-30 6:10 ` Pekka Pietikainen [this message]
2004-08-30 7:04 ` Florian Schirmer
2004-09-17 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-17 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-17 16:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-17 15:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 20:34 ` [PATCH][2/4] b44: Cleanup SiliconBackplane definitions/functions Florian Schirmer
2004-09-17 15:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 20:36 ` [PATCH][3/4] b44: Add support for PHY-less cards Florian Schirmer
2004-08-29 20:39 ` [PATCH][4/4] b44: Add bcm47xx support Florian Schirmer
2004-09-13 23:30 ` [PATCH] Fix for b44 warnings Stephen Hemminger
2004-09-13 23:33 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040830061020.GA21270@ee.oulu.fi \
--to=pp@ee.oulu.fi \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jolt@tuxbox.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.