From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mjt@nysv.org (Markus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20T=F6rnqvist?=) Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:31:16 +0300 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040830063116.GF26192@nysv.org> References: <20040828170515.GB24868@hh.idb.hist.no> <4131074D.7050209@namesys.com> <4131A3B2.30203@namesys.com> <20040829104413.GE871@zip.com.au> <87fz65wt82.fsf@uhoreg.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fz65wt82.fsf@uhoreg.ca> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hubert Chan Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:05:17PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote: >Reiserfs list, and I don't think there was much consensus that came out It's like Gentoo users and patch sets ;) >of it. Currently for Reiser4, AFAIK, the "metas" name is a compile-time >option that you can change by changing a #define, if you're worried >about name clashes. http://mjt.nysv.org/reiser/reiser4.metas.patch -- mjt