From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: cpufreq/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100 cpu-sa1100.c, 1.5, Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:16:07 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040830171607.C22480@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20040829124936.GA16770@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040830152954.A22480@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040830150831.GA9380@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040830150831.GA9380@dominikbrodowski.de>; from linux@dominikbrodowski.de on Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:08:31PM +0200 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:08:31PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:29:54PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > Obviously given this information, this flag needs to be removed from ARM. > > If ARM is the only user, then the flag and associated code needs to be > > completely removed. > > Who shall "push" this patch upstreams? Dave or Russell? The patch looks good, thanks. I think Dave would be better - Dave has been pushing most cpufreq stuff to Linus anyway. Since this is a bug fix rather than a feature, it's definite 2.6.9-rc material. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core