From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268593AbUH3RkT (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:40:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268582AbUH3Riy (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:38:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:955 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268593AbUH3Rhk (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:37:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:37:47 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Alan Cox Cc: "K.R. Foley" , Lee Revell , Daniel Schmitt , Felipe Alfaro Solana , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q4 Message-ID: <20040830173747.GA7319@elte.hu> References: <1093727453.8611.71.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040828211334.GA32009@elte.hu> <1093727817.860.1.camel@krustophenia.net> <1093737080.1385.2.camel@krustophenia.net> <1093746912.1312.4.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040829054339.GA16673@elte.hu> <1093762642.1348.3.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040829190655.GA8840@elte.hu> <4132793C.4030703@cybsft.com> <1093871169.30069.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1093871169.30069.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Alan Cox wrote: > On Llu, 2004-08-30 at 01:47, K.R. Foley wrote: > > Aug 29 09:32:50 daffy kernel: requesting new irq thread for IRQ1... > > Aug 29 09:32:50 daffy kernel: atkbd.c: Spurious ACK on isa0060/serio1. > > Some program, like XFree86, might be trying access hardware directly. > > This is a known bug in the ps/2 driver layer. The printk can be > triggered by multiple quite valid situations. I've suggested it be > removed several times. Also XFree86 is a trademark so it should be > XFree86(tm) ;) since the message was right during detection it was indication of deeper trouble - and indeed it was caused by the IRQ1 thread being starved by init and thus the handler not running at all - the 'spurious ACK' was a weird (and probably buggy) way of the PS2 layer telling that the expected IRQ never arrived ... in any case, this was a bug in the hardirq redirection code. Ingo