From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268275AbUH3Tbb (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:31:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268803AbUH3Tb0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:31:26 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:36035 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268326AbUH3T2p (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:28:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:28:22 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: Brian Litzinger , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Summarizing the PWC driver questions/answers Message-ID: <20040830192822.GL16297@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20040827162613.GB32244@kroah.com> <20040830173157.GA24392@top.worldcontrol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040830173157.GA24392@top.worldcontrol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:31:57AM -0700, Brian Litzinger wrote: > I do not believe he "had no choice". The guards at Auswitchs made the > same argument at Nuremberg. The tribunal determined they did have a > choice. I doubt we can consider the conditions here more extreme > then there. *PLONK*