From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: 1/4 SMT awareness: save cpumask_t cpus Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:04:38 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040830200438.GC8563@dominikbrodowski.de> References: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB6002A3B8F0@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <20040829130134.GC17032@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: davej@redhat.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 12:45:19PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > Actually, I do favor "2" by large, and there simply may not be "dumb" > > governors once we propagate the SMT awareness to the cpufreq core. Zwane, > > are you aware of my current patch set which aims at the same direction? IIRC > > [and my memory might be a bit off after a long vacation], it mostly needs > > work from the "governor" perspective -- and testing. Don't have hardware > > here... > > Yeah, i saw the patches and indeed the work should be done in the > governor, i should be able to help with the testing. Excellent. Will try to update my patches soon. Thanks, Dominik