From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: cpufreq/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100 cpu-sa1100.c, 1.5, Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:23:58 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040831222358.GA19600@redhat.com> References: <20040829124936.GA16770@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040830152954.A22480@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040830150831.GA9380@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040830171607.C22480@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040830171607.C22480@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:08:31PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:29:54PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > Obviously given this information, this flag needs to be removed from ARM. > > > If ARM is the only user, then the flag and associated code needs to be > > > completely removed. > > > > Who shall "push" this patch upstreams? Dave or Russell? > > The patch looks good, thanks. > > I think Dave would be better - Dave has been pushing most cpufreq stuff > to Linus anyway. Since this is a bug fix rather than a feature, it's > definite 2.6.9-rc material. Merged. I've a handful of other small bits I'm about to merge, and then I'll send Linus a pull request tonight. Should make it in for -rc2 unless Linus surprises me 8-). Dave