From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" Subject: Re: Kernel build problem Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 09:23:55 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200409011623.i81GNtSC011621@bach.leonora.org> References: <2A9AA9C52024F94A96634E39B9858FF166B969@empwilex1.empirix.com> Reply-To: "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" Return-path: Received: from dsl081-052-249.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.52.249]:55276 "EHLO bach.leonora.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267601AbUIAQYC (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2004 12:24:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:57:06 EDT." <2A9AA9C52024F94A96634E39B9858FF166B969@empwilex1.empirix.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Dunn, Charles" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To be fair, it's not really a Red Hat issue, but rather Linus's belief that debuggers lead to patching symptoms rather than fixing the underlying problem. --- Vladimir -- Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://leonora.org/~vladimir Palo Alto, CA 94306 +1 650 678 8014 >>>>> "cd" == Charles Dunn writes: >> It is a pity that >> RedHat do not want kdb, it means that RH users have a lot of trouble >> trying to debug their systems. OTOH SuSE are happy to include kdb in >> their distributions. cd> cd> I agree 1000%! I went around and around with RH sales about this. No cd> complaints about the sales person, she really tried to get to the bottom cd> of why this is the way it is, and she even found the answer.. In talking cd> with her it was clear that in 99% of her conversations with RH engineers cd> the attitude was one of: "Debuggers produce bad fixes. Always. Debuggers cd> are evil.".. cd> cd> This is like blaming forks for a person being overweight. Any tool can cd> be used badly. No debugger is a substitute for understanding the code cd> and producing a good solution. But a debugger can illuminate specific cd> problem causes and shorten the debug cycle like few other tools can... cd> This whole debugger thing with RH has been frustrating beyond words. We cd> may even switch from RH to SuSe because of this, but mostly because RH cd> seems to enjoy making life hard for embedded products makers who want to cd> use RH. We are building VoIP test equipment and want to use RH as the OS cd> inside.. They are making us jump through hoops that Microsoft hasn't cd> even thought of yet. It's getting close to the point where it would be cd> cheaper per box sold to have Windows inside than Linux.. Am I crazy or cd> is that just a tad upside down from where Linux is supposed to be cd> going??? cd> cd> -Charlie Dunn cd> Empirix Inc. cd> cd> cd> cd> --------------------------- cd> Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.