From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268050AbUIBJdK (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:33:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268052AbUIBJdK (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:33:10 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.SGI.COM ([192.48.171.19]:6867 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268050AbUIBJdH (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:33:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 02:33:00 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Anton Blanchard Cc: ak@muc.de, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity Message-Id: <20040902023300.4be5d75a.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040901015922.GM26072@krispykreme> References: <20040831183655.58d784a3.pj@sgi.com> <20040901015922.GM26072@krispykreme> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anton wrote: > How does this look? I haven't developed much of an eye yet for the compat routines - so this looks ok to me, but such means little ;). Hopefully someone else with a history here can take a look. Or if you whack me again, I might be able to examine it further. Sorry ... thanks. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373