From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C3fLB-0006Av-1T for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 11:32:45 -0700 Received: from mta11.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.205]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C3fL8-0005WC-4W for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 11:32:43 -0700 Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.207]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040904183234.NDUL404.mta11.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net> for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:32:34 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C3fL0-000550-4l for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 11:32:34 -0700 From: Matt Zimmerman Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Problems compiling any 2.6.x UML Message-ID: <20040904183234.GJ4879@alcor.net> References: <20040903180244.42898.qmail@web54004.mail.yahoo.com> <1094299889.7716.36.camel@localhost> <200409041737.29495.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409041737.29495.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 11:32:34 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 05:37:29PM +0200, BlaisorBlade wrote: > Alle 14:11, sabato 4 settembre 2004, Dominik J=FCrgens ha scritto: > > Thank you very very much, that really fixed the problem! > > > > But why does anyone use the /bin/sh in any script, when he wants to use > > the bash? That is in my opinion a very bad fault!! > > > > My /bin/sh was linked to the /bin/dash, not because I linked it, but > > anything else! It does not seem to be very failure tolerant to suppose > > that /bin/sh is the bash... >=20 > 1) Someone else got a similar problem, because he used a Debian, too, and= he=20 > had /bin/sh -> /bin/dash. Why and when does Debian do this? Debian doesn't do this, but Debian users are permitted to do so if they desire, in order to have a more lightweight /bin/sh. The only requirement is that /bin/sh be POSIX compliant, so scripts which specify #!/bin/sh must be written with only POSIX syntax. --=20 - mdz ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D5047&alloc_id=3D10808&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel