From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] to add device+inode check to ipt_owner.c - HACKED UP
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:39:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040908103922.GD9795@lkcl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040908100946.GA9795@lkcl.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 273 bytes --]
... did i sent a patch?
did i send a patch?? i don't _think_ so *lol* :)
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:09:47AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> dear kernel people,
>
> this is a first pass at attempting to add per-program firewall rule
> checking to iptables.
[-- Attachment #2: ipt_owner.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6491 bytes --]
Index: fs/proc/base.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/selinux/nsa/linux-2.6/fs/proc/base.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.9
diff -u -u -r1.1.1.9 base.c
--- fs/proc/base.c 18 Jun 2004 19:30:20 -0000 1.1.1.9
+++ fs/proc/base.c 8 Sep 2004 01:09:10 -0000
@@ -206,11 +206,12 @@
return -ENOENT;
}
-static int proc_exe_link(struct inode *inode, struct dentry **dentry, struct vfsmount **mnt)
+extern int proc_task_dentry_lookup(struct task_struct *task, struct dentry **dentry, struct vfsmount **mnt);
+
+int proc_task_dentry_lookup(struct task_struct *task, struct dentry **dentry, struct vfsmount **mnt)
{
struct vm_area_struct * vma;
int result = -ENOENT;
- struct task_struct *task = proc_task(inode);
struct mm_struct * mm = get_task_mm(task);
if (!mm)
@@ -233,6 +234,11 @@
return result;
}
+static int proc_exe_link(struct inode *inode, struct dentry **dentry, struct vfsmount **mnt)
+{
+ return proc_task_dentry_lookup(proc_task(inode), dentry, mnt);
+}
+
static int proc_cwd_link(struct inode *inode, struct dentry **dentry, struct vfsmount **mnt)
{
struct fs_struct *fs;
Index: fs/proc/root.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/selinux/nsa/linux-2.6/fs/proc/root.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
diff -u -u -r1.1.1.2 root.c
--- fs/proc/root.c 8 Apr 2004 14:13:50 -0000 1.1.1.2
+++ fs/proc/root.c 8 Sep 2004 01:09:10 -0000
@@ -147,6 +147,8 @@
.parent = &proc_root,
};
+extern int proc_task_dentry_lookup(struct task_struct *task, struct dentry **dentry, struct vfsmount **mnt);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
EXPORT_SYMBOL(proc_sys_root);
#endif
@@ -159,3 +161,4 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(proc_net);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(proc_bus);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(proc_root_driver);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(proc_task_dentry_lookup);
Index: include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_owner.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/selinux/nsa/linux-2.6/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_owner.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -u -r1.1.1.1 ipt_owner.h
--- include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_owner.h 14 Aug 2003 12:09:16 -0000 1.1.1.1
+++ include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_owner.h 8 Sep 2004 01:09:14 -0000
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
#define IPT_OWNER_PID 0x04
#define IPT_OWNER_SID 0x08
#define IPT_OWNER_COMM 0x10
+#define IPT_OWNER_INO 0x20
+
+#define IPT_DEVNAME_SZ 80
struct ipt_owner_info {
uid_t uid;
@@ -14,6 +17,12 @@
pid_t pid;
pid_t sid;
char comm[16];
+
+ /* set these as a pair: specify the filesystem, specify the inode */
+ /* it's the only simple (and unambigous) way to reference a program */
+ char device[IPT_DEVNAME_SZ];
+ unsigned long ino;
+
u_int8_t match, invert; /* flags */
};
Index: net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_owner.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/selinux/nsa/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_owner.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.4
diff -u -u -r1.1.1.4 ipt_owner.c
--- net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_owner.c 13 May 2004 18:03:23 -0000 1.1.1.4
+++ net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_owner.c 8 Sep 2004 01:09:16 -0000
@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
+#include <linux/mount.h>
+#include <linux/dcache.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_owner.h>
@@ -20,6 +25,117 @@
MODULE_AUTHOR("Marc Boucher <marc@mbsi.ca>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("iptables owner match");
+extern int proc_task_dentry_lookup(struct task_struct *task, struct dentry **dentry, struct vfsmount **mnt);
+
+static int proc_exe_check(struct task_struct *task,
+ const char *devname, unsigned long i_num)
+{
+ int result = -ENOENT;
+ struct vfsmount *mnt;
+ struct dentry *dentry;
+ result = proc_task_dentry_lookup(task, &dentry, &mnt);
+ if (result != 0)
+ return result;
+
+ if (!dentry->d_inode)
+ return -ENOENT;
+ if (dentry->d_inode->i_ino == i_num &&
+ strncmp(mnt->mnt_devname, devname, IPT_DEVNAME_SZ) == 0)
+ return 0;
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+#if 0
+static int proc_exe_check(struct task_struct *task,
+ const char *devname, unsigned long i_num)
+{
+ struct vm_area_struct * vma;
+ int result = -ENOENT;
+ struct mm_struct * mm = get_task_mm(task);
+
+ if (!mm)
+ goto out;
+ down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ vma = mm->mmap;
+ while (vma) {
+ if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_EXECUTABLE) &&
+ vma->vm_file) {
+ struct vfsmount *mnt = mntget(vma->vm_file->f_vfsmnt);
+ struct dentry *dentry = dget(vma->vm_file->f_dentry);
+ if (!dentry->d_inode)
+ continue;
+ if (dentry->d_inode->i_ino == i_num &&
+ strncmp(mnt->mnt_devname, devname, IPT_DEVNAME_SZ) == 0)
+ {
+ result = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ vma = vma->vm_next;
+ }
+ up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mmput(mm);
+out:
+ return result;
+}
+#endif
+
+static int
+match_inode(const struct sk_buff *skb, const char *devname, unsigned long i_num)
+{
+ struct task_struct *g, *p;
+ struct files_struct *files;
+ /*
+ struct inode *inode;
+ struct super_block *sb;
+ struct block_device *bd;
+ */
+ int i;
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+
+ /* lkcl: these are fairly obvious (just obtuse): hunt for the
+ * filesystem device, then its superblock, then the inode is
+ * relevant to that superblock, _then_ we can find the inode.
+ bd = bdget(dev);
+ if (!bd)
+ goto out;
+
+ sb = get_super(bd);
+ if (!sb)
+ goto out;
+
+ inode = ilookup(sb, i_num);
+ if (!inode)
+ goto out;
+ */
+
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ do_each_thread(g, p) {
+
+ if (proc_exe_check(p, devname, i_num))
+ continue;
+
+ task_lock(p);
+ files = p->files;
+ if(files) {
+ spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+ for (i=0; i < files->max_fds; i++) {
+ if (fcheck_files(files, i) ==
+ skb->sk->sk_socket->file) {
+ spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+ task_unlock(p);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+ }
+ task_unlock(p);
+ } while_each_thread(g, p);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
match_comm(const struct sk_buff *skb, const char *comm)
{
@@ -163,6 +279,12 @@
return 0;
}
+ if(info->match & IPT_OWNER_INO) {
+ if (!match_inode(skb, info->device, info->ino) ^
+ !!(info->invert & IPT_OWNER_INO))
+ return 0;
+ }
+
return 1;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 10:09 [patch] to add device+inode check to ipt_owner.c - HACKED UP Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-08 10:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-08 13:43 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-08 10:39 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [this message]
2004-09-08 10:47 ` viro
2004-09-08 13:35 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-10 7:49 ` Gianni Tedesco
2004-09-10 9:57 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-10 11:11 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040908103922.GD9795@lkcl.net \
--to=lkcl@lkcl.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.