From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: static freq table support for Pentium M Dothan Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:00:35 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040909070035.GA8243@dominikbrodowski.de> References: <20040908213140.GA7842@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040908220139.GA8116@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Stefan Tomanek Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:07:02PM +0000, Stefan Tomanek wrote: > I'll do that, and I've already contacted other people running using the same > Notebook. I also tried that cpufreq-acpi_pdump module: > > number of states: 2 > acpi_pdump: P0: 1500 MHz, 0 mW, 100 uS s:0x0 c:0x83 > acpi_pdump: P1: 600 MHz, 0 mW, 100 uS s:0x1 c:0x183 > control_register: > 130 12 1 16 0 0 178 > status_register: > 130 12 1 8 0 0 179 What does cpufreq-acpi_pdump with argument "pdc=1" report? Thanks, Dominik