From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: powernow-k8: Two PSTs Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 21:59:02 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040909205902.GA5740@redhat.com> References: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A843AA1A1E@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A843AA1A1E@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mark.langsdorf@amd.com Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 02:26:00PM -0500, mark.langsdorf@amd.com wrote: > > After subscribing to the list and looking at the archive, I > > found Mark Langsdorf's patch and explanation for my problem. > > (http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq/2004-August/0 > 04191.html) > > It's unfortunate that the archive isn't public but the patch > > worked perfectly. Is there any chance for this or a similar > > patch to be submitted for inclusion into the mainline kernel ? > > I thought by submitting it to this list I was submitting it > to the mainline kernel. indeed, that is the case. > If that is not the case, I can post > it on LKML at any time. I'm a little behind with merging due being knee-deep in packing boxes and movers, and my regular workstation being inaccessable for a few weeks. It's in my queue, I just haven't found the time yet to go through it. I'll look into it tomorrow. thanks, Dave