From: Matt Hemingway <matt.hemingway@pcnalert.com>
To: Tony Gogoi <tgogoi@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
Cc: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Monolithic kernel again
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:13:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040910131336.4ff36228@matth.ilan.cogent.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.56.0409101549150.19830@hadar.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
This is just my personal experience, but I build with no module support all the time and I've never put the root="nomodules /dev/hda9" in the lilo.conf file. Have you tried it without the "nomodules" statement?
Also, are your boot= default= and image= options set right (especially to the new kernel and not the previous one)?
-Matt
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:01:28 -0400 (EDT)
Tony Gogoi <tgogoi@cse.Buffalo.EDU> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This question is about the monolithic kernel again. Hope I'm not bugging
> the newsgroup. But I've tried many things and things still don't seem to
> work.
>
> My kernel is 2.4.20-8 from RedHat CD 9.0. I compiled the kernel without
> module support. My lilo line as a root="nomodules /dev/hda9". Booting
> seems to begin normally.
>
> Booting stops saying QM_MODULES: function not implemented. I have read on
> the net that that could be fixed with module-init-tools. But my question
> is rather generic: All the problems I get are related to module support. I
> have tried modifying the /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit to avoid modprobes etc
> script etc but to no avail.
>
> I would be grateful for some suggestions on how to make a monolithic
> kernel completely independent of any module support.
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-10 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-10 20:01 Monolithic kernel again Tony Gogoi
2004-09-10 20:13 ` Matt Hemingway [this message]
2004-09-10 20:28 ` Tony Gogoi
2004-09-10 20:53 ` Matt Hemingway
2004-09-10 21:31 ` terry white
2004-09-10 23:41 ` Tony Gogoi
2004-09-11 11:57 ` joy
2004-09-11 20:44 ` terry white
2004-09-11 20:58 ` Adrian C.
2004-09-11 23:38 ` Monolithic kernel again : Fixed :-) Tony Gogoi
2004-09-12 19:39 ` Monolithic kernel again terry white
2004-09-11 23:36 ` Tony Gogoi
2004-09-13 8:09 ` Andrew Kelly
2004-09-10 21:37 ` terry white
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-12 22:27 terry white
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040910131336.4ff36228@matth.ilan.cogent.net \
--to=matt.hemingway@pcnalert.com \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgogoi@cse.Buffalo.EDU \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.