From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, dipankar@us.ibm.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Put size in array to get rid of barriers in grow_ary()
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:40:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040911034025.GA8676@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040908220753.GD1240@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 03:07:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 04:39:43PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be a little nicer to start ipc_ids off pointing to a
> > const ipc_id_ary of size 0, to avoid the various entries == NULL
> > tests you had to add?
>
> I like this one!!! Will put a patch together. Manfred's recent
> patch applied a refcount, which negates the const part, but should
> be no problem to put a size-zero structure in the struct ipc_ids.
> (Having a separately allocated structure puts me back to checking
> NULL pointers due to possibility of allocation failure.)
And here, finally, is the updated patch. Still untested.
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
Signed-off-by: paulmck@us.ibm.com
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5-rap/ipc/msg.c linux-2.5-iloi/ipc/msg.c
--- linux-2.5-rap/ipc/msg.c Tue Sep 7 10:04:36 2004
+++ linux-2.5-iloi/ipc/msg.c Fri Sep 10 16:43:10 2004
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_msgctl (int msqid, i
int success_return;
if (!buf)
return -EFAULT;
- if(cmd == MSG_STAT && msqid >= msg_ids.size)
+ if(cmd == MSG_STAT && msqid >= msg_ids.entries->size)
return -EINVAL;
memset(&tbuf,0,sizeof(tbuf));
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5-rap/ipc/sem.c linux-2.5-iloi/ipc/sem.c
--- linux-2.5-rap/ipc/sem.c Tue Sep 7 10:04:36 2004
+++ linux-2.5-iloi/ipc/sem.c Fri Sep 10 16:43:33 2004
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int semctl_nolock(int semid, int
struct semid64_ds tbuf;
int id;
- if(semid >= sem_ids.size)
+ if(semid >= sem_ids.entries->size)
return -EINVAL;
memset(&tbuf,0,sizeof(tbuf));
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5-rap/ipc/util.c linux-2.5-iloi/ipc/util.c
--- linux-2.5-rap/ipc/util.c Tue Sep 7 10:04:36 2004
+++ linux-2.5-iloi/ipc/util.c Fri Sep 10 16:36:23 2004
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ void __init ipc_init_ids(struct ipc_ids*
if(size > IPCMNI)
size = IPCMNI;
- ids->size = size;
ids->in_use = 0;
ids->max_id = -1;
ids->seq = 0;
@@ -74,14 +73,17 @@ void __init ipc_init_ids(struct ipc_ids*
ids->seq_max = seq_limit;
}
- ids->entries = ipc_rcu_alloc(sizeof(struct ipc_id)*size);
+ ids->entries = ipc_rcu_alloc(sizeof(struct kern_ipc_perm *)*size +
+ sizeof(struct ipc_id_ary));
if(ids->entries == NULL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "ipc_init_ids() failed, ipc service disabled.\n");
- ids->size = 0;
+ size = 0;
+ ids->entries = &ids->nullentry;
}
- for(i=0;i<ids->size;i++)
- ids->entries[i].p = NULL;
+ ids->entries->size = size;
+ for(i=0;i<size;i++)
+ ids->entries->p[i] = NULL;
}
/**
@@ -104,7 +106,7 @@ int ipc_findkey(struct ipc_ids* ids, key
* since ipc_ids.sem is held
*/
for (id = 0; id <= max_id; id++) {
- p = ids->entries[id].p;
+ p = ids->entries->p[id];
if(p==NULL)
continue;
if (key == p->key)
@@ -118,36 +120,36 @@ int ipc_findkey(struct ipc_ids* ids, key
*/
static int grow_ary(struct ipc_ids* ids, int newsize)
{
- struct ipc_id* new;
- struct ipc_id* old;
+ struct ipc_id_ary* new;
+ struct ipc_id_ary* old;
int i;
+ int size = ids->entries->size;
if(newsize > IPCMNI)
newsize = IPCMNI;
- if(newsize <= ids->size)
+ if(newsize <= size)
return newsize;
- new = ipc_rcu_alloc(sizeof(struct ipc_id)*newsize);
+ new = ipc_rcu_alloc(sizeof(struct kern_ipc_perm *)*newsize +
+ sizeof(struct ipc_id_ary));
if(new == NULL)
- return ids->size;
- memcpy(new, ids->entries, sizeof(struct ipc_id)*ids->size);
- for(i=ids->size;i<newsize;i++) {
- new[i].p = NULL;
+ return size;
+ new->size = newsize;
+ memcpy(new->p, ids->entries->p, sizeof(struct kern_ipc_perm *)*size +
+ sizeof(struct ipc_id_ary));
+ for(i=size;i<newsize;i++) {
+ new->p[i] = NULL;
}
old = ids->entries;
/*
- * before setting the ids->entries to the new array, there must be a
- * smp_wmb() to make sure the memcpyed contents of the new array are
- * visible before the new array becomes visible.
+ * Use rcu_assign_pointer() to make sure the memcpyed contents
+ * of the new array are visible before the new array becomes visible.
*/
- smp_wmb(); /* prevent seeing new array uninitialized. */
- ids->entries = new;
- smp_wmb(); /* prevent indexing into old array based on new size. */
- ids->size = newsize;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ids->entries, new);
ipc_rcu_putref(old);
- return ids->size;
+ return newsize;
}
/**
@@ -175,7 +177,7 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struc
* ipc_ids.sem is held
*/
for (id = 0; id < size; id++) {
- if(ids->entries[id].p == NULL)
+ if(ids->entries->p[id] == NULL)
goto found;
}
return -1;
@@ -195,7 +197,7 @@ found:
new->deleted = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock(&new->lock);
- ids->entries[id].p = new;
+ ids->entries->p[id] = new;
return id;
}
@@ -216,15 +218,15 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm* ipc_rmid(struct ip
{
struct kern_ipc_perm* p;
int lid = id % SEQ_MULTIPLIER;
- if(lid >= ids->size)
+ if(lid >= ids->entries->size)
BUG();
/*
* do not need a rcu_dereference()() here to force ordering
* on Alpha, since the ipc_ids.sem is held.
*/
- p = ids->entries[lid].p;
- ids->entries[lid].p = NULL;
+ p = ids->entries->p[lid];
+ ids->entries->p[lid] = NULL;
if(p==NULL)
BUG();
ids->in_use--;
@@ -234,7 +236,7 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm* ipc_rmid(struct ip
lid--;
if(lid == -1)
break;
- } while (ids->entries[lid].p == NULL);
+ } while (ids->entries->p[lid] == NULL);
ids->max_id = lid;
}
p->deleted = 1;
@@ -493,9 +495,9 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm* ipc_get(struct ipc
{
struct kern_ipc_perm* out;
int lid = id % SEQ_MULTIPLIER;
- if(lid >= ids->size)
+ if(lid >= ids->entries->size)
return NULL;
- out = ids->entries[lid].p;
+ out = ids->entries->p[lid];
return out;
}
@@ -503,25 +505,15 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm* ipc_lock(struct ip
{
struct kern_ipc_perm* out;
int lid = id % SEQ_MULTIPLIER;
- struct ipc_id* entries;
+ struct ipc_id_ary* entries;
rcu_read_lock();
- if(lid >= ids->size) {
+ entries = rcu_dereference(ids->entries);
+ if(lid >= entries->size) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return NULL;
}
-
- /*
- * Note: The following two read barriers are corresponding
- * to the two write barriers in grow_ary(). They guarantee
- * the writes are seen in the same order on the read side.
- * smp_rmb() has effect on all CPUs. rcu_dereference()
- * is used if there are data dependency between two reads, and
- * has effect only on Alpha.
- */
- smp_rmb(); /* prevent indexing old array with new size */
- entries = rcu_dereference(ids->entries);
- out = entries[lid].p;
+ out = entries->p[lid];
if(out == NULL) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return NULL;
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5-rap/ipc/util.h linux-2.5-iloi/ipc/util.h
--- linux-2.5-rap/ipc/util.h Tue Sep 7 10:04:36 2004
+++ linux-2.5-iloi/ipc/util.h Fri Sep 10 17:52:17 2004
@@ -15,18 +15,19 @@ void sem_init (void);
void msg_init (void);
void shm_init (void);
-struct ipc_ids {
+struct ipc_id_ary {
int size;
+ struct kern_ipc_perm *p[0];
+};
+
+struct ipc_ids {
int in_use;
int max_id;
unsigned short seq;
unsigned short seq_max;
struct semaphore sem;
- struct ipc_id* entries;
-};
-
-struct ipc_id {
- struct kern_ipc_perm* p;
+ struct ipc_id_ary nullentry;
+ struct ipc_id_ary* entries;
};
void __init ipc_init_ids(struct ipc_ids* ids, int size);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-11 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-07 23:09 [RFC][PATCH] Put size in array to get rid of barriers in grow_ary() Paul E. McKenney
2004-09-08 15:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-09-08 22:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-09-11 3:40 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2004-09-13 11:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-09-13 18:40 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-09-13 18:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040911034025.GA8676@us.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.