From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zombie.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8DNJqrT006818 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:19:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from open.hands.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by zombie.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8DNJoSW003225 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:19:51 GMT Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:31:02 +0100 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: James Carter Cc: Russell Coker , SE Linux Subject: Re: policy patch against latest CVS Message-ID: <20040913233102.GC30524@lkcl.net> References: <200409111954.15823.russell@coker.com.au> <1095106801.2161.19.camel@moss-lions.epoch.ncsc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1095106801.2161.19.camel@moss-lions.epoch.ncsc.mil> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:20:01PM -0400, James Carter wrote: > Merged. > > On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 05:54, Russell Coker wrote: > > The attached patch adds the dev_fs attribute in a few places where it was > > missed before and uses the dev_fs attribute for tmpfs_t:filesystem associate. > > > > It puts all the tmpfs /dev stuff inside distro_redhat because currently no > > other distribution seems to be even considering doing this sort of thing (the is this tmpfs /dev in an initrd, or is this tmpfs /dev stuff in udev? because yes, my distro - debian-based - _is_ doing a tmpfs udev. and no it isn't doing tmpfs /dev in an initrd. i trust that that has been taken into account. thanks, l. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.